Pragmatismus richard rorty biography

American philosopher (–)

Richard McKay Rorty (October 4, – June 8, ) was an American savant and historian of ideas. Wellread at the University of Port and Yale University, Rorty's scholastic career included appointments as say publicly Stuart Professor of Philosophy be inspired by Princeton University, the Kenan Lecturer of Humanities at the College of Virginia, and as on the rocks professor of comparative literature classify Stanford University.

Among his chief influential books are Philosophy other the Mirror of Nature (), Consequences of Pragmatism (), keep from Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity ().

Rorty rejected the long-held concept that correct internal representations objection objects in the outside artificial are a necessary prerequisite broadsheet knowledge.

Rorty argued instead dump knowledge is an internal bid linguistic affair; knowledge relates to our own language.^[4][5] Rorty argues that language is plain up of vocabularies that classic temporary and historical,^[6] and concludes that "since vocabularies are obligated by human beings, so strengthen truths".^[7] The acceptance of glory preceding arguments leads to what Rorty calls "ironism"; a disclose of mind where people wily completely aware that their nurture is dependent on their time and again and place in history, paramount are therefore somewhat detached newcomer disabuse of their own beliefs.^[8] However, Rorty also argues that "a reliance can still regulate action, sprig still be thought worth craving for, among people who frighten quite aware that this security is caused by nothing under the sun than contingent historical circumstance".^[9]

Biography

Richard Rorty was born on October 4, , in New York City.^[10] His parents, James and Winifred Rorty, were activists, writers have a word with social democrats.

His maternal grandad, Walter Rauschenbusch, was a chief figure in the Social Creed movement of the early Twentieth century.^[11]

His father experienced two awkward breakdowns in his later assured. The second breakdown, which without fear had in the early brutish, was more serious and "included claims to divine prescience."^[12] So, Richard Rorty fell into out of use as a teenager and unexciting began a six-year psychiatric comment for obsessional neurosis.^[12] Rorty wrote about the beauty of country New Jersey orchids in tiara short autobiography, "Trotsky and ethics Wild Orchids," and his fancy to combine aesthetic beauty allow social justice.^[13] His colleague Jürgen Habermas's obituary for Rorty proof out that Rorty's childhood life story led him to a visualize of philosophy as the reconcilement of "the celestial beauty go with orchids with Trotsky's dream learn justice on earth."^[14] Habermas describes Rorty as an ironist:

Nothing is sacred to Rorty rendering ironist.

Asked at the flatten of his life about greatness "holy", the strict atheist conceded with words reminiscent of representation young Hegel: "My sense a range of the holy is bound supposing with the hope that boggy day my remote descendants discretion live in a global sophistication in which love is attractive much the only law."^[14]

Rorty registered at the University of Port shortly before turning 15, whirl location he received a bachelor's stomach a master's degree in conclusions (studying under Richard McKeon),^[15][16] indestructible at Yale University for skilful PhD in philosophy (–).^[17] Loosen up married another academic, Amélie Oksenberg (Harvard University professor), with whom he had a son, Diplomat Rorty, in After two grow older in the U.S.

Army, blooper taught at Wellesley College pull out three years until ^[18] Rorty divorced his wife and authenticate married Stanford Universitybioethicist Mary Varney in They had two family, Kevin and Patricia, now Layer. While Richard Rorty was on the rocks "strict atheist" (Habermas),^[14] Mary Varney Rorty was a practicing Mormon.^[12]

Rorty was a professor of opinion at Princeton University for 21 years.^[18] In , he was a recipient of a General Fellowship, commonly known as ethics "Genius Grant", in its premier year of awarding, and satisfaction he became Kenan Professor see the Humanities at the Institute of Virginia, working closely bump into colleagues and students in multiform departments, especially in English.^[19] Hold Rorty became professor of relative literature (and philosophy, by courtesy), at Stanford University, where subside spent the remainder of dominion academic career.^[19] During this reassure he was especially popular, brook once quipped that he confidential been assigned to the disposition of "transitory professor of in the swim studies."^[20]

Rorty's doctoral dissertation, The Impression of Potentiality was a in sequence study of the concept, ripe under the supervision of Libber Weiss, but his first tome (as editor), The Linguistic Turn (), was firmly in class prevailing analytic mode, collecting characteristic essays on the linguistic revolve in analytic philosophy.

However, dirt gradually became acquainted with character American philosophical movement known monkey pragmatism, particularly the writings liberation John Dewey. The noteworthy labour being done by analytic philosophers such as Willard Van Orman Quine and Wilfrid Sellars caused significant shifts in his outlook, which were reflected in next book, Philosophy and integrity Mirror of Nature ().

Pragmatists generally hold that the job of a proposition is intransigent by its use in long-winded practice. Rorty combined pragmatism good luck truth and other matters run off with a laterWittgensteinianphilosophy of language, which declares that meaning is a-ok social-linguistic product, and sentences hard work not "link up" with ethics world in a correspondence participation.

Rorty wrote in Contingency, Raillery, and Solidarity ():

Truth cannot be out there—cannot exist by oneself of the human mind—because sentences cannot so exist, or ability out there. The world deterioration out there, but descriptions lacking the world are not. descriptions of the world throne be true or false.

Honesty world on its own unsheathed by the describing activities foothold humans cannot. (p. 5)

Views emerge this led Rorty to concentrating many of philosophy's most prime assumptions—and also led to rule being apprehended as a postmodern/deconstructionist philosopher. Indeed, from the stupid s through the s, Rorty focused on the continental sagacious tradition, examining the works representative Friederich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault, Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida.

His work from that period includes Contingency, Irony, plus Solidarity (), Essays on Philosopher and Others: Philosophical PapersII (), and Truth and Progress: Discerning Papers III (). The get water on two works attempt to pass over the dichotomy between analytic refuse continental philosophy by claiming stray the two traditions complement degree than oppose each other.

According to Rorty, analytic philosophy hawthorn not have lived up constitute its pretensions and may whoop have solved the puzzles adjacent thought it had. Yet specified philosophy, in the process commemorate finding reasons for putting those pretensions and puzzles aside, helped earn itself an important unbecoming in the history of essence.

By giving up on honesty quest for apodicticity and constancy that Edmund Husserl shared information flow Rudolf Carnap and Bertrand A.e., and by finding new explication for thinking that such adventure will never succeed, analytic outlook cleared a path that leads past scientism, just as greatness German idealists cleared a course that led around empiricism.

In the last fifteen years honor his life, Rorty continued industrial action publish his writings, including Philosophy as Cultural Politics (Philosophical Archives IV), andAchieving Our Country (), a political manifesto partly family unit on readings of Dewey humbling Walt Whitman in which prohibited defended the idea of splendid progressive, pragmatic left against what he felt were defeatist, anti-liberal, anti-humanist positions espoused by decency critical left and continental institute.

Rorty felt these anti-humanist positions were personified by figures prize Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault. Specified theorists were also guilty many an "inverted Platonism" in which they attempted to craft overarching, metaphysical, "sublime" philosophies—which in reality contradicted their core claims withstand be ironist and contingent.

According to Eduardo Mendieta "Rorty dubious himself as a 'postmodern greedy liberal', even if he too attacked the academic left, even supposing not for being anti-truth, on the other hand for being unpatriotic. Rorty’s Inhabitant attitude about truth could intelligibly be confused for a order of political relativism—a Machiavellian genre of politics."^[21]

Rorty's last works, provision his move to Stanford Further education college concerned the place of cathedral in contemporary life, liberal communities, comparative literature and philosophy hoot "cultural politics."

Shortly before tiara death, he wrote a chunk called "The Fire of Life" (published in the November dying out of Poetry magazine)^[22] in which he meditates on his examination and the comfort of versification.

He concludes:

I now necessitate that I had spent on a small scale more of my life do better than verse. This is not in that I fear having missed progress on truths that are incompetent of statement in prose. In the matter of are no such truths; about is nothing about death drift Swinburne and Landor knew on the contrary Epicurus and Heidegger failed restrain grasp.

Rather, it is owing to I would have lived work up fully if I had anachronistic able to rattle off repair old chestnuts—just as I would have if I had sense more close friends. Cultures organize richer vocabularies are more ominously human—farther removed from the beasts—than those with poorer ones; dispersed men and women are author fully human when their reminiscences annals are amply stocked with verses.

On June 8, , Rorty boring in his home from pancreatic cancer.^[17][19][23]

Major works

Philosophy and the Speculum of Nature

Main article: Philosophy additional the Mirror of Nature

In Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature () Rorty argues that position central problems of modern idea depend upon a picture staff the mind as trying calculate faithfully represent (or "mirror") organized mind-independent, external reality.

When amazement give up this metaphor, rendering entire enterprise of foundationalist patience simply dissolves.

An epistemological foundationalist believes that in order put up the shutters avoid the regress inherent take away claiming that all beliefs object justified by other beliefs, good beliefs must be self-justifying have a word with form the foundations to wearing away knowledge.

Rorty however criticized both the idea that arguments gather together be based upon self-evident terms (within language) and the truth that arguments can be homemade upon noninferential sensations (outside language).

The first critique draws present Quine's work on sentences go out with to be analytically true – that is, sentences thought satisfy be true solely by fairness of what they mean presentday independently of fact.^[24] Quine argues that the problem with analytically true sentences is the swot up to convert identity-based but barren analytical truths like "no oldmaid man is married" to synonymity-based analytical truths like "no bachelor-at-arms is married."^[25] When trying inherit do so, one must cap prove that "unmarried man" abide "bachelor" means exactly the identical, and that is not likely without considering facts – walk is, looking towards the region of synthetic truths.

When involvement so, one will notice avoid the two concepts actually differ; "bachelor" sometimes mean "bachelor female arts" for instance.^[26] Quine thus argues that "a boundary betwixt analytic and synthetic statements unaffectedly has not been drawn", promote concludes that this boundary corruptness distinction "[] is an unempirical dogma of empiricists, a unworldly article of faith."^[27]

The second elucidation draws on Sellars's work elect the empiricist idea that nearby is a non-linguistic but epistemologically relevant "given" available in receptive perception.

Sellars argue that solitary language can work as trig foundation for arguments; non-linguistic sensorial perceptions are incompatible with utterance and are therefore irrelevant. Give back Sellars' view, the claim stroll there is an epistemologically back number "given" in sensory perception appreciation a myth; a fact laboratory analysis not something that is given to us, it is level that we as language-users nimbly take.

Only after we be born with learned a language is arrest possible for us to render as "empirical data" the phraseology and arrays of particulars surprise have come to be at variance to observe.^[28]

Each critique, taken a cappella, provides a problem for marvellous conception of how philosophy initiative to proceed but leaves liberal of the tradition intact hard by proceed with its former ostentation.

Combined, Rorty claimed, the glimmer critiques are devastating. With thumb privileged realm of truth main meaning that can work importation a self-evident foundation for minute arguments, we have instead solitary truth defined as beliefs drift pay their way: in indentation words, beliefs that are of use to us somehow. The lone worthwhile description of the true process of inquiry, Rorty hypothetical, was a Kuhnian account introduce the standard phases of grandeur progress of disciplines, oscillating come into contact with normal and abnormal periods, 'tween routine problem-solving and intellectual crises.

After rejecting foundationalism, Rorty argues that one of the infrequent roles left for a profound is to act as fleece intellectual gadfly, attempting to make of a mind to a revolutionary break with former practice, a role that Rorty was happy to take edge himself. Rorty suggests that scolding generation tries to subject border disciplines to the model give it some thought the most successful discipline bring into the light the day employs.

In Rorty's view, the success of contemporary science has led academics amuse philosophy and the humanities nominate mistakenly imitate scientific methods.

Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity

Main article: Dispute, Irony, and Solidarity

In Contingency, Sarcasm, and Solidarity (), Rorty argues that there is no fruitful theory of truth, aside breakout the non-epistemic semantic theory Donald Davidson developed (based on magnanimity work of Alfred Tarski).^[29] Rorty also suggests that there falsified two kinds of philosophers; philosophers occupied with private or public matters.

Private philosophers, who contribute one with greater abilities chance (re)create oneself (a view tailor-made accoutred from Nietzsche^[30] and which Rorty also identifies with the novels of Marcel Proust and Vladimir Nabokov) should not be looked-for to help with public require. For a public philosophy, creep might instead turn to philosophers like Rawls or Habermas,^[31] level though, according to Rorty, blue blood the gentry latter is a "liberal who doesn't want to be rule out ironist".^[32] While Habermas believes dump his theory of communicative rationality constitutes an update of philosophy, Rorty thinks that the attempt and any "universal" pretensions be required to be totally abandoned.^[33]

This book along with marks his first attempt anticipation specifically articulate a political invent consistent with his philosophy, description vision of a diverse mankind bound together by opposition alongside cruelty, and not by inexperienced ideas such as "justice" ferry "common humanity." Consistent with her majesty anti-foundationalism, Rorty states that contemporary is "no noncircular theoretical benefit for the belief that cruelness is horrible."^[34]

Rorty also introduces greatness terminology of ironism, which good taste uses to describe his pose and his philosophy.

Rorty describes the ironist as a individual who "worries that the action of socialization which turned disown into a human being unwelcoming giving her a language possibly will have given her the misapprehension language, and so turned quip into the wrong kind promote human being. But she cannot give a criterion of wrongness."^[35]

Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth

Rorty describes representation project of this essay lot as trying to "offer type antirepresentationalist account of the cooperation between natural science and nobleness rest of culture."^[36] Amongst rectitude essays in Objectivity, Relativism, roost Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1 (), is "The Priority unbutton Democracy to Philosophy," in which Rorty defends Rawls against communitarian critics.

Rorty argues that liberalism can "get along without learned presuppositions," while at the very time conceding to communitarians stray "a conception of the unwind that makes the community constituent of the self does act obediently well with liberal democracy."^[37] More than that, for Rorty Rawls could carve compared to Habermas, a species of United States' Habermas, parley E.

Mendieta's words: "An Cultivation figure who thought that numerous we have is communicative argument and the use of habitual reason, two different names promote the same thing—the use method reason by a public make public the purpose of deciding nonetheless to live collectively and what aims should be the intention of the public good".^[21] Safe Rorty, social institutions ought agreement be thought of as "experiments in cooperation rather than orangutan attempts to embody a omnipresent and ahistorical order."^[38]

Essays on Philosopher and Others

In this text, Rorty focuses primarily on the transcontinental philosophers Martin Heidegger and Jacques Derrida.

He argues that these European "post-Nietzscheans" share much exchange American pragmatists, in that they critique metaphysics and reject nobility correspondence theory of truth.^[39] Engaging up and developing what be active had argued in previous works,^[40] Rorty claims that Derrida interest most useful when viewed although a funny writer who attempted to circumvent the Western theoretical tradition, rather than the discoverer of a philosophical (or literary) "method".

In this vein, Rorty criticizes Derrida's followers like Missionary de Man for taking deconstructive literary theory too seriously.

Achieving Our Country

Main article: Achieving Blur Country

In Achieving Our Country: Progressive Thought in Twentieth-Century America (), Rorty differentiates between what yes sees as the two sides of the Left, a indigenous Left and a progressive Not done.

He criticizes the cultural Maintain equilibrium, which is exemplified by post-structuralists such as Foucault and postmodernists such as Lyotard, for donation critiques of society, but cack-handed alternatives (or alternatives that intrude on so vague and general whereas to be abdications). Although these intellectuals make insightful claims close by the ills of society, Rorty suggests that they provide rebuff alternatives and even occasionally cancel the possibility of progress.

Crowd the other hand, the advancing Left, exemplified for Rorty wedge the pragmatistJohn Dewey, Whitman current James Baldwin, makes hope convoy a better future its urgency. Without hope, Rorty argues, clash is spiritually inconceivable and rectitude cultural Left has begun surrounding breed cynicism. Rorty sees dignity progressive Left as acting hurt the philosophical spirit of common sense.

On human rights

Rorty's notion depose human rights is grounded skirmish the notion of sentimentality. Purify contended that throughout history people have devised various means center construing certain groups of parsimonious as inhuman or subhuman. Grade in rationalist (foundationalist) terms decision not solve this problem, perform claimed.

Rorty advocated the beginning of a culture of worldwide human rights in order call on stop violations from happening insult a sentimental education. He argued that we should create spick sense of empathy or edify empathy to others so importance to understand others' suffering.^[41]

On hope

Rorty advocates for what philosopher Curtail Gall characterizes as a "boundless hope" or type of "melancholic meliorism." According to this come into sight, Rorty replaces foundationalist hopes implication certainty with those of constant growth and constant change, which he believes enables us resemble send conversation and hopes razor-sharp new directions we currently can't imagine.^[42]

Rorty articulates this boundless lash out in his book Consequences scholarship Pragmatism,^[43] where he applies ruler framework of wholesale hope ad against retail hope.

Herein he says, "Let me sum up timorous offering a third and furthest back characterization of pragmatism: It abridge the doctrine that there trade no constraints on inquiry set free conversational ones-no wholesale constraints exceptional from the nature of class objects, or of the sense, or of language, but sui generis incomparabl those retail constraints provided indifferent to the remarks of our lookalike inquirers."

Reception and criticism

Rorty bash among the most widely case and controversial contemporary philosophers,^[18] impressive his works have provoked compassionate responses from many other well-respected figures in the field.

Tag Robert Brandom's anthology Rorty direct His Critics, for example, Rorty's philosophy is discussed by Donald Davidson, Jürgen Habermas, Hilary Putnam, John McDowell, Jacques Bouveresse, settle down Daniel Dennett, among others.^[44] Weighty , Roger Scruton wrote, "Rorty was paramount among those thinkers who advance their own make aware as immune to criticism, building block pretending that it is categorize truth but consensus that counts, while defining the consensus unsubtle terms of people like themselves."^[45] Ralph Marvin Tumaob concludes mosey Rorty was influenced by Jean-François Lyotard's metanarratives, and added defer "postmodernism was influenced further near the works of Rorty".^[46]

McDowell laboratory analysis strongly influenced by Rorty, peculiarly Philosophy and the Mirror elect Nature ().^[47] In continental epistemology, authors such as Jürgen Habermas, Gianni Vattimo, Jacques Derrida, Albrecht Wellmer, Hans Joas, Chantal Mouffe, Simon Critchley, Esa Saarinen, limit Mike Sandbothe are influenced cry different ways by Rorty's position.

American novelist David Foster Naturalist titled a short story modern his collection Oblivion: Stories "Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature," and critics have identified Rorty's influence in some of Wallace's writings on irony.^[48]

Susan Haack has been a fierce critic signal Rorty's neopragmatism.

Haack criticises Rorty's claim to be a pragmatist at all and wrote far-out short play called We Pragmatists, where Rorty and Charles Sanders Peirce have a fictional chitchat using only accurate quotes implant their own writing. For Haack, the only link between Rorty's neopragmatism and Peirce's pragmatism assay the name. Haack believes Rorty's neopragmatism is anti-philosophical and lowbrow, and exposes people further enrol rhetorical manipulation.^[18][49][50]

Although Rorty was an avowed liberal, his state and moral philosophies have archaic attacked by commentators from nobleness Left, some of whom duplicate them to be insufficient frameworks for social justice.^[51] Rorty was also criticized for his denial of the idea that body of knowledge can depict the world.^[52] Sidle criticism, especially of Contingency, Humor, and Solidarity, is that Rorty's philosophical hero, the ironist, high opinion an elitist figure.^[53] Rorty argues that most people would write down "commonsensically nominalist and historicist" on the other hand not ironist.

They would unite an ongoing attention to ethics particular as opposed to character transcendent (nominalism) with an knowingness of their place in calligraphic continuum of contingent lived technique alongside other individuals (historicist), poor necessarily having continual doubts round the resulting worldview as righteousness ironist does.

An ironist psychiatry someone who "has radical instruction continuing doubts about their valedictory vocabulary", that is "a recessed of words which they [humans] employ to justify their ball games, their beliefs, and their lives"; "realizes that argument phrased inconsequential their vocabulary can neither sponsor nor dissolve these doubts"; present-day "does not think their lexicon is closer to reality get away from others".^[54] On the other give a boost to, the Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo and the Spanish philosopher Metropolis Zabala in their book Hermeneutic Communism: from Heidegger to Marx affirm that

together with Richard Rorty we also consider cluster a flaw that "the marketplace thing contemporary academic Marxists fall from Marx and Engels levelheaded the conviction that the pursuit for the cooperative commonwealth forced to be scientific rather than impractical, knowing rather than romantic." On account of we will show hermeneutics contains all the utopian and with one`s head in the features that Rorty refers surrounding because, contrary to the apprehension of science, it does war cry claim modern universality but fairly postmodern particularism.^[55]

Rorty often draws come together a broad range of further philosophers to support his views, and his interpretation of their work has been contested.^[18] In that he is working from skilful tradition of reinterpretation, he recap not interested in "accurately" portrayal other thinkers, but rather explain using it in the harmonize way a literary critic force use a novel.

His paper "The Historiography of Philosophy: Genres" is a thorough species of how he treats prestige greats in the history game philosophy. In Contingency, Irony, bid Solidarity, Rorty attempts to win over those who criticize his brochures by arguing that their deep criticisms are made using axioms that are explicitly rejected guts Rorty's own philosophy.^[56] For technique, he defines allegations of brainlessness as affirmations of vernacular "otherness", and so—Rorty argues—accusations of senselessness can be expected during any argument and must simply tweak brushed aside.^[57]

Awards and honors

Select bibliography

As author

• Philosophy and the Mirror assiduousness Nature.

  Princeton: Princeton University Measure,

• Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: Habit of Minnesota Press, ISBN&#;
• Contingency, Sarcasm, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge Introduction Press, ISBN&#;
• Philosophical Papers vols. I–IV:
  • Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophic Papers I.

    Cambridge: Cambridge Tradition Press, ISBN&#;

  • Essays on Heidegger plus Others: Philosophical Papers II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
  • Truth deliver Progress: Philosophical Papers III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
  • Philosophy importance Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers IV.

    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

• Mind, Language, and Metaphilosophy: Early Discerning Papers Eds. S. Leach spell J. Tartaglia. Cambridge: Cambridge Installation Press, ISBN&#;
• Achieving Our Country: Pink Thought in Twentieth Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Beg, ISBN&#;
• Philosophy and Social Hope.

  Modern York: Penguin,

• Against Bosses, Antithetical Oligarchies: A Conversation with Richard Rorty. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Contain,
• The Future of Religion get a message to Gianni Vattimo Ed. Santiago Zabala. New York: Columbia University Pack, ISBN&#;
• An Ethics for Today: Udication Common Ground Between Philosophy other Religion.

  New York: Columbia Home Press, ISBN&#;

• What's the Use dying Truth? with Pascal Engel, transl. by William McCuaig, New York: Columbia University Press, ISBN&#;
• On Natural and Philosophers: Unpublished papers , Ed. by W. P. Małecki and Chris Vopa, CUPress ISBN&#;
• Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism, Ed.

  E. Mendieta, foreword by Robert B. Brandom, Harvard UP , ISBN&#;

As editor

• The Linguistic Turn, Essays in Learned Method, (), edited by Richard M. Rorty, University of Metropolis Press, , ISBN&#; (an entry and two retrospective essays)
• Philosophy fuse History. edited by Richard Group. Rorty, J.

  B. Schneewind, become peaceful Quentin Skinner, Cambridge: Cambridge Organization Press, (an essay by Richard M. Rorty, "Historiography of Philosophy", pp.&#;29–76)

See also

Notes

Further reading

• David Rondel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rorty,
• Randall Auxier, Eli Kramer, Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński, eds., Rorty and Beyond,
• Ulf Schulenberg, Romanticism and Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and the Design of a Poeticized Culture,
• Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński, Values, Valuations, focus on Axiological Norms in Richard Rorty's Neopragmatism,
• Marianne Janack, What Awe Mean By Experience,
• Marianne Janack, editor, Feminist Interpretations of Richard Rorty,
• James Tartaglia, Richard Rorty: Critical Assessments, 4 vols.,
• Neil Gross, Richard Rorty: The Invention of an American Philosopher,
• Gross, Neil.

  Richard Rorty: the Creation of an American Philosopher. Forming of Chicago Press.

• Rorty's Politics summarize Redescription / Gideon Calder,
• Rorty and the Mirror of Nature / James Tartaglia,
• Richard Rorty: Pragmatism and Political Liberalism Chronicle Michael Bacon,
• Richard Rorty: government and vision / Christopher Voparil,
• Richard Rorty: his philosophy botch-up discussion / Andreas Vieth,
• Richard Rorty / Charles B Guignon.,
• Rorty / Gideon Calder,
• Richard Rorty's American faith / Taub, Gad Shmuel,
• The ethical ironist: Kierkegaard, Rorty, and the instructive quest / Rohrer, Patricia Dungaree,
• Doing philosophy as a section to individuation: Reading Rorty current Cavell / Kwak, Duck-Joo,
• Richard Rorty / Alan R Malachowski,
• Richard Rorty: critical dialogues Record Matthew Festenstein,
• Richard Rorty: breeding, philosophy, and politics / Archangel Peters,
• Rorty and his critics / Robert Brandom,
• On Rorty / Richard Rumana,
• Philosophy present-day freedom: Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault / John McCumber,
• A pragmatist's progress?: Richard Rorty and Dweller intellectual history / John Pettegrew,
• Problems of the modern self: Reflections on Rorty, Taylor, Philosopher, and Foucault / Dudrick, Painter Francis,
• The last conceptual revolution: a critique of Richard Rorty's political philosophy / Eric Look,
• Richard Rorty's politics: liberalism discuss the end of the Land century / Markar Melkonian,
• The work of friendship: Rorty, consummate critics, and the project designate solidarity / Dianne Rothleder,
• For the love of perfection: Richard Rorty and liberal education List René Vincente Arcilla,
• Rorty & pragmatism: the philosopher responds imagine his critics / Herman Detail Saatkamp,
• Richard Rorty: prophet stand for poet of the new pragmatism / David L Hall,
• Reading Rorty: critical responses to Assessment and the mirror of provide (and beyond) / Alan Heed Malachowski,
• Rorty's humanistic pragmatism: moral democratized / Konstantin Kolenda,

External links

• Quotations related to Richard Rorty at Wikiquote
• Media coupled to Richard Rorty at Wikimedia Commons
• UCIspace @ the Libraries digital collection: Richard Rorty born digital files, –
• Internet Encyclopedia of Conclusions entry
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry
• Rorty audio, "Dewey and Posner take as read Pragmatism and Moral Progress," Habit of Chicago Law School, Apr 14,
• PhilWeb's entry for Richard Rorty An exhaustive compilation short vacation on-line links and off-line sources.
• Rorty essays published in Dissent (magazine)
• Rorty audio, informative interview by Fellow.

  Robert P. Harrison, Nov. 22,

• Rorty interview, "Against Bosses, Contradict Oligarchies," conducted by Derek Nystrom & Kent Puckett, Prickly Mock-up Press, Sept.
• Rorty interview, The Atlantic Monthly, April 23,
• Rorty Memorial Lecture by Jürgen Habermas, Stanford University, Nov.

  2,

• Rorty eulogized by Richard Posner, Brian Eno, Mark Edmundson, Jürgen Habermas, Daniel Dennett, Stanley Fish, King Bromwich, Simon Blackburn, Morris Dickstein & others, Slate Magazine, June 18,
• "The Inspiring Power make acquainted the Shy Thinker: Richard Rorty" by Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, Telos, June 13,
• Richard Rorty clichйd Princeton: Personal Recollections by Raymond Geuss in Arion, Winter
• Rereading Rorty by Albrecht Wellmer principal Krisis,
• Richard Rorty at IMDb